Showing posts with label cctv anomalies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cctv anomalies. Show all posts

The Unseen Presence: Dissecting the Scariest Ghost Videos Caught on Camera



Introduction: The Unseen Presence

The silence of the night is often broken by whispers, not from the wind, but from the void. Today, we delve into the chilling recordings that claim to capture those whispers made visible: phantom figures, spectral anomalies, and phenomena that defy conventional explanation. We aren't just watching scary videos; we're scrutinizing raw data, attempting to peel back the layers of perception and technology to find a kernel of truth, or perhaps, the absence of it. This isn't about jump scares; it's about the cold, analytical dissection of the inexplicable. When a camera lens, designed to capture reality, instead records the impossible, our duty is to investigate.

The Nature of Video Evidence in Paranormal Investigations

Video footage has become a cornerstone of modern paranormal investigation. The promise of objective, irrefutable proof is alluring. However, the reality is far more complex. Digital cameras, even those used for casual recordings on smartphones or dedicated paranormal equipment, are susceptible to a myriad of artifacts and misinterpretations. From lens flares and dust particles to pareidolia—the psychological phenomenon where the mind perceives familiar patterns in random stimuli—and deliberate hoaxes, the visual field is rife with potential deceptions. As investigators, our first line of defense is a rigorous understanding of these possibilities. We must approach every frame with a healthy dose of skepticism, assuming a mundane explanation until absolute evidence forces us to consider the extraordinary. The very technology that captures the alleged anomaly can also be the source of its illusion. This rigorous analysis is critical before we even entertain the notion of a genuine paranormal event. Understanding the limitations and capabilities of devices like high-sensitivity cameras and infrared sensors is paramount.

"The camera never lies, they say. But what if the 'truth' it captures is merely a distortion of light, a trick of the mind, or a carefully constructed deception? Our job is to be the ultimate lie detector for the lens."

Case Study 1: The Terrifying TikTok Specter

The digital age has spawned a new frontier for alleged paranormal encounters: social media platforms like TikTok. Many viral videos claim to show terrifying ghost phenomena. One such instance, often circulated, depicts what appears to be a fleeting, translucent figure materializing in the background of a user's bedroom, often late at night. Initial impressions are often visceral; the figure's form, though indistinct, suggests a human-like shape, moving with an unnatural stillness or a sudden jerk. However, a critical analysis demands we consider multiple factors. Is it a reflection from an unseen light source outside the frame? Could it be a digital artifact from the video compression common on these platforms? Or perhaps a strategically placed object or even a deliberate prank by the user? The speed at which these videos gain traction necessitates a rapid, yet thorough, deconstruction. We must question the context: the room's lighting, the presence of reflective surfaces, and the user's reaction. Often, the most compelling videos are those with the least context, making them ripe for speculation but difficult to verify. Investing in an EMF meter or a low-light camera could help potential investigators capture more reliable data.

Case Study 2: Cemetery Ghost Captured by Paranormal Investigators

Cemeteries, by their very nature, are locations imbued with a profound sense of history and often, melancholy. They are fertile ground for ghost stories, and consequently, for alleged paranormal sightings. A frequently discussed type of video emerges from paranormal investigation teams who actively explore these sites. These often feature "orbs"—spherical light anomalies—or transient, mist-like forms captured by specialized cameras. One particular clip that has circulated shows investigators moving through a graveyard, their EMF meters spiking, followed by the appearance of a faint, ethereal shape near a gravestone. The raw footage, often presented without significant editing, is intended to convey authenticity. However, even dedicated investigators can be fooled. Orbs are notoriously difficult to differentiate from dust particles illuminated by flash photography or camera lights. Mist-like phenomena can be caused by moisture in the air, breath condensation in cold environments, or even lens smudges. When analyzing such footage, we must consider the equipment used and the environmental conditions. Did the investigators use a full-spectrum camera? What were the ambient temperature and humidity? Were there any external light sources that could cause reflections or lens flares? Without meticulous attention to these details, even the most well-intentioned investigation can yield misleading results. The acquisition of professional-grade ghost hunting equipment, such as a K2 meter, is an investment for serious researchers.

Case Study 3: The Enigmatic Figure on CCTV

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage offers a unique perspective: surveillance footage, often recorded in controlled or semi-controlled environments, is usually less prone to intentional user manipulation than personal recordings. Yet, it is precisely in these mundane settings that some of the most perplexing anomalies have been captured. One recurring theme in unexplained video compilations involves a figure, often described as an "old woman," appearing in the frame where no person was visibly present. These figures are typically translucent, sometimes appearing to glide or float rather than walk. Analyzing such CCTV footage requires a systematic approach. First, we must assess the camera's quality and resolution. Older CCTV systems, especially, can produce grainy images prone to artifacts that can be mistaken for spectral forms. We need to consider the possibility of reflections from windows or other surfaces within the camera's view. Could the "figure" be a shadow cast by an object outside the direct line of sight of the camera, or perhaps a defect in the recording medium itself? The consistency of reported sightings—a specific type of figure in a particular location—can lend weight to a case, but only if coupled with rigorous technical analysis. The potential for electromagnetic interference affecting the recording equipment should also be investigated, as this can sometimes manifest as visual distortions. For those interested in deeper analysis, resources like John Keel's works on the Mothman offer insights into interpreting anomalous visual data.

Case Study 4: The Girl During the Piñata Game

The innocence of childhood activities can sometimes be juxtaposed with unsettling phenomena, leading to some of the most widely shared "ghost videos." A recurring narrative involves footage from a birthday party or a similar gathering where a group of friends is playing piñata. In many of these clips, a faint, child-like figure is allegedly captured in the background, often appearing to observe the proceedings. The emotional resonance of such a sighting—a child's spirit seemingly present at a celebration—makes these videos particularly compelling and disturbing. However, our analytic lens must remain sharp. What appear to be ghostly children can often be explained by visual phenomena related to event photography. Lens flares, reflections from balloons or decorations, or even unusually shaped shadows cast by the lighting used at parties can be mistaken for spectral entities. Pareidolia plays a significant role here; the human mind is adept at finding faces and forms in ambiguous shapes. Furthermore, the energy and movement typical of a child's party can create dynamic lighting conditions that produce transient visual anomalies. If such a sighting were to occur during an investigation, it would be crucial to identify the exact light sources, any reflective surfaces, and to have multiple witnesses confirm the visual experience independently. The possibility of hoaxing, even in seemingly innocent contexts, cannot be dismissed. Understanding the physics of light and shadow is as critical as studying psychic phenomena.

Investigator's Verdict: Illusion, Anomaly, or Authentic Apparition?

After dissecting these compelling, and often terrifying, recordings, the question remains: what are we truly seeing? The truth, as it often does in our field, lies in the nuanced space between outright dismissal and blind acceptance. While the allure of definitive proof of the afterlife is strong, Occam's Razor frequently points towards simpler explanations. Many of these "ghost videos" can be attributed to a confluence of factors: technological limitations of recording devices, environmental conditions, psychological predispositions like pareidolia, and, regrettably, deliberate hoaxes. The viral nature of platforms like TikTok amplifies these phenomena, but also provides fertile ground for misinformation. However, to dismiss all such videos outright would be intellectually lazy. There are instances where residual anomalies persist, challenging our current understanding of physics and consciousness. The persistence of certain types of images, the consistency of reports across different technologies and investigators, and the sheer emotional impact on witnesses can't always be easily explained away. My verdict? The vast majority likely stem from mundane causes. Yet, a persistent, albeit small, percentage remain compellingly anomalous. These require further investigation, perhaps with more advanced equipment like a full-spectrum camera system or specialized audio recorders for EVP analysis, to move beyond speculation towards empirical understanding. The pursuit of these rare, truly inexplicable events is what defines our mission.

Technological Considerations: Equipment and Interpretation

The tools of a modern paranormal investigator are becoming increasingly sophisticated, mirroring advances in digital imaging and audio recording. However, with sophistication comes the potential for greater misinterpretation. High-definition cameras, infrared sensors, and sensitive audio recording devices can capture details often invisible to the naked eye. This is invaluable for detecting subtle anomalies. Yet, these same devices can also record dust motes with a strange luminescence, temperature fluctuations that appear as mist, or audio interference that mimics speech—known as Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP). A critical aspect of analyzing recorded anomalies is understanding the specific capabilities and limitations of the equipment used. For example, a common K2 EMF meter can spike due to faulty wiring or radio signals, not just paranormal energy. Similarly, a Spirit Box, while a popular tool for communication, operates by rapidly scanning radio frequencies, often producing sounds that the brain interprets as words. A key part of the research process involves not just capturing phenomena, but meticulously documenting the conditions under which they were recorded and understanding how the technology itself might influence the output. Acquiring and mastering this equipment, from specialized cameras to sophisticated audio analysis software, is crucial for anyone serious about paranormal investigation. The investment in a good quality digital voice recorder, for instance, is non-negotiable for serious EVP work.

The Investigator's Archive: Essential Viewing and Reading

To truly understand the complexities of alleged paranormal video evidence, one must immerse oneself in the historical and ongoing research in the field. Accessing curated resources is not just about entertainment; it's about building a foundational knowledge base. For visual phenomena, studying historical cases and contemporary investigations provides context. Books like John Keel's "The Eighth Tower" offer profound insights into anomalous reports, while contemporary documentaries such as "Missing 411" (available on Gaia) delve into patterns of disappearances that defy logical explanation, often involving eyewitness accounts that hint at unseen forces. Furthermore, understanding the psychological underpinnings of perception is vital. Works by researchers like J. Allen Hynek, who applied scientific rigor to UFO sightings, provide a template for how to approach inexplicable phenomena. For those seeking to replicate or understand the capture of EVP, studying guides on audio analysis techniques is indispensable. Exploring resources on Gaia or Discovery+ can provide a wealth of investigative material, offering different perspectives and case studies that build a comprehensive understanding of the paranormal landscape. Remember, every piece of data, every recorded anomaly, is a potential clue in a much larger, ongoing investigation.

Protocol: Analyzing Anomalous Visual Phenomena

When confronted with potentially anomalous video footage, a structured approach is paramount. This protocol outlines the essential steps to move from initial observation to informed analysis:

  1. Preserve Original Footage: Never work with copies. Ensure the original, unedited recording is secured to prevent any manipulation or loss of data.
  2. Document Context: Record all available details about the recording environment: time of day, date, location, weather conditions, individuals present, and any subjective experiences reported by witnesses at the time.
  3. Technical Assessment of Equipment: Identify the make and model of the recording device. Research its specifications, including resolution, low-light capabilities, and potential artifacts associated with its use.
  4. Environmental Scan: Rule out all mundane explanations. Check for reflections, light sources outside the frame, dust, insects, condensation, or digital glitches common to the specific camera model or platform (e.g., TikTok compression).
  5. Analyze Movement and Form: Observe any apparent movement. Does it conform to known physics? Is the form consistent, or does it shift and dissipate unnaturally? Compare the anomaly's behavior to known phenomena like shadows, smoke, or optical illusions.
  6. Audio-Visual Correlation: If audio is present, analyze it for correlations with visual anomalies. Are there EVPs or sounds that coincide with the visual event?
  7. Witness Testimony Analysis: Interview witnesses separately. Look for consistency in their descriptions and any signs of suggestion or leading questions influencing their accounts.
  8. Comparative Analysis: Compare the footage with known hoaxes, misidentified phenomena, and documented cases of genuine anomalies. Consult databases of paranormal evidence.
  9. Seek Expert Opinion: If possible, consult with experts in photography, videography, or paranormal investigation to gain additional perspectives.
  10. Formulate Hypothesis: Based on the evidence, propose the most likely explanation, ranging from mundane causes to paranormal activity. Acknowledge the level of certainty or uncertainty.

This methodical process is crucial for separating potential evidence from mere artifacts or fabrications. It's the backbone of credible paranormal research.

Frequently Asked Questions About Ghost Videos

Q1: Can ghost videos be proven real?
While definitive proof remains elusive for many, rigorous analysis of high-quality footage, combined with consistent witness testimony and the elimination of all mundane explanations, can strengthen the case for a paranormal event. However, "proof" in the scientific sense is exceptionally difficult to achieve in this field.
Q2: What is the most common explanation for ghost videos?
The most common explanations include pareidolia (seeing patterns in random stimuli), lens flares, dust particles, reflections, camera artifacts, and deliberate hoaxes. These mundane causes account for the vast majority of alleged ghost sightings on video.
Q3: What equipment is best for capturing ghost videos?
For serious investigation, a full-spectrum camera capable of capturing infrared and ultraviolet light, a high-sensitivity low-light camera, and a professional-grade digital audio recorder for EVP are essential. However, understanding how to use and interpret data from these tools is more important than the equipment itself.
Q4: How can I tell if a ghost video is fake?
Look for inconsistencies in lighting, unnatural movements, digital glitches, the lack of environmental interaction (e.g., a figure passing through objects without affecting them if it's meant to be a solid apparition), or overly dramatic reactions from witnesses. Cross-referencing the footage with known hoax techniques is also advisable.

Your Field Mission: Documenting Your Own Local Legends

The world is replete with local legends and unexplained occurrences that persist through oral tradition. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to become the investigator of your own community's mysteries. Identify a local legend, a place whispered to be haunted, or an unexplained event that has been passed down through generations. Armed with the analytical techniques discussed in this report, attempt to gather credible information. This might involve interviewing long-time residents, researching historical records, or, if conditions permit and safety is assured, subtly observing the location at relevant times. Document your findings meticulously, always prioritizing critical analysis and the elimination of mundane explanations. Can you find any visual or anecdotal evidence that stands up to scrutiny? Share your findings, your challenges, and your tentative conclusions in the comments section below. Let's see what hidden truths your own local folklore might hold.

Conclusion

The allure of ghost videos lies in their ability to breach the veil between our perceived reality and the unknown. While the digital realm presents an endless stream of purported evidence, our role as investigators is to approach each clip not with fear, but with forensic precision. By dissecting the technological, psychological, and environmental factors at play, we move closer to understanding these phenomena, whether they eventually resolve into known causes or remain as compelling anomalies that challenge our understanding of existence itself. The quest for truth is an ongoing process, one frame at a time.

About the Author

alejandro quintero ruiz is a veteran field investigator dedicated to the analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach combines methodological skepticism with an open mind to the inexplicable, always seeking the truth behind the veil of reality. With years of experience navigating the shadowy intersections of science and the unknown, his work aims to foster critical thinking and informed debate within the paranormal community.

Posted by No comments:
Etiquetas: , , , , , , , ,

The Unseen Archives: Analyzing Anomalous Visual Phenomena from the Paranormal Spectrum



Introduction: The Digital Echo Chamber

In an era saturated with digital recordings, the line between verifiable evidence and fabricated spectacle has become increasingly blurred. We are inundated with visual data streams, each claiming to capture the inexplicable. But how much of this "caught on camera" phenomenon is genuine anomalous activity, and how much is a product of misinterpretation, deliberate hoaxing, or the inherent limitations of our recording devices? Today, we don't just watch these videos; we dissect them. We are opening the files on footage that purports to show phenomena deliberately kept from public view, challenging the viewer to look beyond the sensationalism and engage in critical analysis.

Classification of Anomalous Visual Media

The first step in any serious investigation – paranormal or otherwise – is rigorous classification. The "scariest videos" phenomenon often lumps together disparate phenomena without proper categorization, leading to flawed conclusions. We must differentiate between:

  • Atmospheric and Optical Phenomena: Often mistaken for solid objects.
  • Technological Artifacts: Glitches, lens flares, dust particles, or digitally inserted elements.
  • Psychological Factors: Pareidolia, apophenia, and sugestibility playing on the observer's mind.
  • Genuine Anomalies: Phenomena that defy conventional scientific explanation, requiring further investigation into fields like psychotronics, cryptid biology, or parapsychology.

The purported content of these "hidden" videos spans several archetypes, each demanding a specific analytical approach. This isn't about blind acceptance; it's about methodical deconstruction.

UFOs: Beyond the Veil of Atmospheric Optics

Reports of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), now more academically termed Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), are frequently presented as startling visual evidence. The claim that such videos are "hidden" suggests a deliberate suppression of information by governmental or clandestine organizations. However, a critical analysis often reveals mundane explanations. Many UAP sightings can be attributed to advanced drone technology, atmospheric reflections, misidentified aircraft, or even celestial bodies observed under unusual conditions. The challenge lies in separating genuine, unexplained sightings—those that resist conventional explanation even after exhaustive analysis—from the noise of misidentifications. The RAND Corporation and other research bodies have long studied these phenomena, often concluding that while a small percentage remains truly anomalous, the majority fall within the realm of the known, albeit sometimes poorly understood.

For instance, a common visual artifact is the "lens flare," a reflection of a bright light source within the camera lens itself. Another is the "orb," a phenomenon frequently debated, which can often be explained by dust particles, moisture, or insects close to the lens, illuminated by the flash or light source. Understanding these common optical illusions is paramount before jumping to extraterrestrial conclusions. Investing in high-definition recording equipment and employing analytical software for image enhancement can sometimes reveal the mundane truth behind these supposed UFO sightings.

For those serious about investigating UAP, understanding the work of researchers like J. Allen Hynek and the transition from UFO to UAP in official discourse is essential. Advanced optical analysis tools can be crucial here.

Jinn and Spectral Entities: The Elusive Visual Manifestations

The concept of Jinn, entities prevalent in Middle Eastern and Islamic folklore, often intersects with Western notions of ghosts and spirits. When visual "evidence" emerges, it typically involves indistinct shapes, shadowy figures, or unexplained movements captured on camera. The difficulty in analyzing such footage is its inherent lack of detail and the cultural context that influences interpretation. Are we seeing a genuine manifestation of an unseen entity, or is it a shadow cast by mundane objects, a trick of light, or even a deliberate digital manipulation? The cultural narratives surrounding Jinn often imbue subjective experiences with objective reality, making unbiased visual analysis particularly challenging. Without controlled environments and multiple corroborating sensory inputs (auditory, tactile), visual anomalies alone are insufficient for definitive classification.

The challenge with spectral evidence, particularly when captured on CCTV, is the potential for digital manipulation. Sophisticated editing software can convincingly insert figures or alter scenes. Furthermore, the human brain is adept at finding patterns in randomness (pareidolia), leading us to "see" faces or figures in abstract shapes or shadows. This psychological predisposition, combined with low-resolution or poorly lit footage, creates fertile ground for misinterpretation. The consistent reporting of similar visual anomalies across different geographical locations and cultures, as documented in historical texts and, more recently, in paranormal investigation forums, does lend some weight to the possibility of persistent, unexplained phenomena. However, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and visual media alone, especially when susceptible to digital alteration, rarely reaches that threshold.

Haunted Vessels: Maritime Anomalies and Their Visual Recording

Maritime folklore is rich with tales of ghost ships and spectral crews. The isolation of the sea and the unique atmospheric conditions can contribute to unusual visual phenomena. Videos purporting to show "haunted ships" often feature unexplained lights, fleeting figures on deck, or even apparitions of historical vessels. Analyzing such content requires a deep understanding of maritime phenomena, including atmospheric refractions (like mirages), phosphorescence, and the psychological impact of long, isolated voyages. The claim that such footage is "hidden" implies a deliberate effort to suppress evidence of the supernatural, often linked to naval secrets or classified operations.

Investigating maritime hauntings involves cross-referencing visual records with historical logs, crew testimonies, and known navigational hazards. The spectral "lady ghost" often mentioned in these compilations is a classic archetype. While such footage might be compelling at first glance, a rigorous analysis would involve identifying the source of illumination, potential reflections, or even evidence of tampering. The environment of a ship, with its confined spaces and often poor lighting, can exacerbate misinterpretations. For instance, reflections on glass surfaces or condensation can easily be mistaken for spectral figures, especially in low-light conditions common on vessels.

CCTV Apparitions: An Analysis of Ghostly Footage

Closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, by their nature, offer a persistent, often unedited recording of events. This makes any perceived anomaly particularly arresting. Videos claiming to show ghosts caught on CCTV are a staple of "scary compilation" content. These often feature a figure appearing or disappearing inexplicably, moving objects without apparent cause, or fleeting apparitions in hallways or rooms. From an investigator's perspective, the primary concerns are the authenticity of the recording and the potential for technical glitches or environmental factors to create the illusion.

Are these recordings authentic, or are they clever fabrications? The "ghost girl caught on CCTV" is a recurring motif. Analysis must focus on frame-by-frame examination for digital manipulation, continuity errors, and the physics of movement. Can the apparition’s movement be explained by lighting anomalies, reflections on surfaces, or even the presence of airborne particulates illuminated by the camera's infrared capabilities? The consistent availability and alleged "hidden" nature of such videos raise questions about their provenance. Are they hidden because they are truly anomalous, or because their creators wish to profit from sensationalism without rigorous validation? The digital watermark or lack thereof, the timestamp's legitimacy, and the context of the recording are all critical data points for any serious investigation.

The sheer volume of alleged ghost footage captured by CCTV cameras necessitates a systematic approach. Researchers often employ software to analyze light patterns, motion vectors, and audio irregularities (if applicable). The use of ghost hunting equipment, such as EMF meters or thermal cameras, while popular, often lacks scientific validation when used in uncontrolled environments and can yield ambiguous readings. The true value of CCTV footage lies in its potential for objective documentation, provided it has not been compromised.

Investigator's Verdict: Veracity, Manipulation, or Misinterpretation?

After dissecting the various archetypes of alleged paranormal visual evidence, the verdict remains consistent with my fieldwork: skepticism is the primary tool, but an open mind is the necessary companion. The vast majority of these "hidden" or "scariest" videos, when subjected to rigorous analysis, succumb to explanations rooted in optics, psychology, technology, or outright fabrication. The allure of the unexplained fuels a desire for sensationalism, often at the expense of factual accuracy. However, dismissing every anomaly wholesale would be intellectually negligent. The persistent reports across various media—from anecdotal accounts to purportedly captured footage—suggest phenomena that our current scientific paradigms struggle to fully encompass. The true "hidden" aspect may not be the evidence itself, but the rigorous, time-consuming process of validating it and understanding its true nature. Until such validation occurs, these recordings remain intriguing, but unproven, anomalies.

The Investigator's Archive

For those who wish to delve deeper into the methodology of analyzing paranormal evidence, specific resources are invaluable. My personal archive includes:

  • Books:
    • "The Skeptics UFO Newsletter" by Philip J. Klass (for a critical perspective on UFOs).
    • "The Coming of the Saucers" by Donald Keyhoe (a historical, though dated, look at early UFO reports).
    • "ESP, Power, and Personality: Selected Papers" by Gertrude Schmeidler (for insights into parapsychological research).
    • "The Ghost Hunter's Survival Guide" by Christopher Marsella (practical advice, though requires discerning application).
    • "The Real World UFOs" by Jacques Vallee (a more rigorous and academic approach to UAP).
  • Documentaries:
    • "The Phenomenon" (a comprehensive look at UAP history and recent developments).
    • "Searching for The Truth" (series exploring various paranormal claims).
    • "Hellier" (a multi-season investigation into a specific paranormal case).
  • Platforms:
    • Gaia.com (a platform offering extensive content on paranormal and esoteric topics, requires critical viewing).
    • YouTube Channels focusing on investigative journalism and skepticism (e.g., Veritasium, SciShow, and channels dedicated to debunking hoaxes).

Accessing and critically evaluating these resources is the first step in developing your own analytical framework.

Your Field Mission: Critical Analysis of Found Footage

The next time you encounter a video claiming to be a "hidden scary ghost video" or an "unexplained UFO sighting," do not accept it at face value. Apply the principles of this analysis:

  1. Source Verification: Who recorded it? When? Is there any context beyond the sensational title?
  2. Skepticism First: What are the most obvious, mundane explanations? (Orbs, dust, reflections, insects, lens flares, digital artifacts).
  3. Technical Assessment: If possible, examine the footage for signs of digital manipulation (inconsistent lighting, unnatural movements, glitches).
  4. Corroboration: Is there any independent verification or corroborating evidence from the same event?
  5. Psychological Bias: Consider how your own expectations or desire to believe might be influencing your interpretation.

Document your findings. Share your analysis in the comments below, detailing the methods you employed and your conclusions. The goal is not to debunk for the sake of debunking, but to cultivate a discerning eye for genuine anomalies amidst the deluge of dubious content.

alejandro quintero ruiz is a veteran field investigator dedicated to the analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach combines methodological skepticism with an open mind to the inexplicable, always seeking the truth behind the veil of reality. His years of fieldwork have honed his ability to dissect evidence and distinguish between the theatrical and the genuinely mysterious.

Posted by No comments:
Etiquetas: , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)