Showing posts with label spooky footage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spooky footage. Show all posts

The Top 20 SCARIEST Ghost Videos of the Year: An Investigative Dossier



Introduction: The Unseen Spectacle

The digital age has gifted us unprecedented access to the fringes of reality. What was once confined to hushed whispers and grainy, single-source accounts is now a constant stream of visual data. This compilation, purportedly the "Top 20 SCARIEST Ghost Videos of the Year," represents an attempt to curate the most compelling visual anomalies from the past twelve months. But as any seasoned investigator knows, the truly terrifying aspect isn't merely what we see, but what remains obscured, what is deliberately fabricated, and what lies just beyond our current understanding. Today, we don't just watch these clips; we dissect them, seeking the signal within the noise, the genuine tremor of the inexplicable amidst the cacophony of hoaxes.

Methodology: Compiling the Unexplained

The creators of this compilation, identified as "Nuke's Top 5," claim to have meticulously sifted through a year's worth of submissions and their own catalogued footage. The stated goal was to isolate not just "scary" videos, but those exhibiting clear manifestations of paranormal activity. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Haunted Locations: Environments demonstrating residual or intelligent hauntings.
  • Ghost Hunter Expeditions: Footage captured during dedicated paranormal investigations.
  • Poltergeist Activity: Manifestations involving physical disturbances without a visible agent.
  • Haunted Objects: Possessions exhibiting anomalous behaviors, such as dolls or antiques.
  • Apparitions: Visual or spectral appearances of entities.
  • Extreme Paranormal Activity: Cases exhibiting high levels of energetic or physical phenomena.

The decision to expand beyond a conventional Top 10 to a Top 20 suggests a desire to showcase a broader spectrum of reported phenomena, acknowledging that significant anomalies can occur with varying degrees of intensity and frequency. This comprehensive approach, while potentially diluting the impact of the absolute "scariest" instances, allows for a richer analysis of the diversity within reported paranormal visual evidence.

Deep Dive: Deconstructing the Paranormal in Visual Media

The inherent challenge with "ghost videos" is their reliance on subjective interpretation and the prevalence of both natural explanations and outright deception. Our task here is to move beyond the initial shock value and apply a layer of critical analysis, reminiscent of a forensic examination. When presented with any visual anomalies, the primary investigative protocol dictates a systematic elimination of the mundane. This involves scrutinizing:

  • Environmental Factors: Was the anomaly caused by lighting conditions, dust particles, insects, lens flares, natural light refractions, or even seismic vibrations? Many "orbs" captured by amateur ghost hunters are simply dust or insects illuminated by the flash or ambient light.
  • Physical Explanations: Could the movement, sound, or visual distortion be attributed to drafts, structural settling in old buildings, malfunctioning equipment, or even the investigator's own movement?
  • Psychological Phenomena: Pareidolia, the tendency to perceive familiar patterns (like faces or figures) in random stimuli, is a powerful factor. Auditory pareidolia also plays a role in interpreting EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena).
  • Intentional Deception: This is, perhaps, the most pervasive issue. The allure of internet fame and potential monetization drives many to fabricate evidence. This can range from simple editing tricks to elaborate staged events.

The "Nuke's Top 5" compilation, by its very nature as a curated list, likely presents phenomena that have already passed some initial filter for perceived anomaly. However, this filter is often based on the creator's own criteria, which may not align with rigorous investigative standards. The sheer volume of cases in a Top 20 list also increases the statistical probability that some entries are less convincing than others, or are potentially outright fakes.

"The line between a genuine spectral manifestation and a cleverly edited hoax is becoming increasingly blurred. Our duty as investigators is to approach every piece of evidence with the same skeptical rigor, assuming deception until proven otherwise."

The Nature of Visual Evidence in Haunting Cases

Visual evidence, while often the most compelling to the untrained eye, is also the most susceptible to manipulation. A photograph or video can capture a fleeting moment, but its context, its framing, and its post-production treatment are critical variables.

Consider the common types of visual anomalies presented in such compilations:

  • Orbs: As mentioned, these are frequently dust, insects, or moisture illuminated by light sources. Advanced investigations often employ multiple cameras and specific lighting to differentiate these artifacts.
  • Apparitions/Shadow Figures: These can range from fleeting glimpses in the periphery to more defined forms. Skeptics often attribute these to EVPs amplified by suggestion, minor physical movements misinterpreted, or shadows cast by ambient light sources. However, consistent, detailed apparitions reported by multiple, unconnected witnesses and captured on independent recording devices warrant deeper study.
  • Moving Objects: Poltergeist activity is a classic category. While unexplained movement is undeniably intriguing, investigations must rule out drafts, vibrations, unstable surfaces, and direct manipulation. The use of motion-activated cameras in controlled environments is crucial here.
  • Vocal Phenomena (EVP): While not strictly visual, EVP is often paired with video footage. Distinguishing genuine anomalous voices from radio interference, background noise, or cryptolalia (unconscious or subvocalized speech) requires careful audio analysis and often specialized equipment such as high-sensitivity recorders.

The "Top 20" format inherently prioritizes impact. This can lead to the inclusion of videos that are short, sensational, and lack sufficient context or corroborating evidence. A truly robust investigation would require detailed logs, witness testimonies, environmental readings (EMF levels, temperature fluctuations), and the elimination of all known natural and artificial causes.

Anomaly Type Common Skeptical Explanations Investigative Considerations
Orbs Dust, insects, moisture, lens flare, digital artifacts Multiple cameras, controlled lighting, environmental readings (EMF, temperature)
Apparitions/Shadow Figures Pareidolia, shadows, reflections, light anomalies, hallucinations Consistent witness testimony, corroborating evidence (EMF spikes, EVP), witness psychological state
Moving Objects Drafts, vibrations, unstable surfaces, remote control, hidden mechanisms Controlled environment testing, motion sensors, elimination of external forces

Investigator's Verdict: Between Phenomenon and Fabrication

The compilation of "Top 20 SCARIEST Ghost Videos" serves as a compelling, albeit raw, collection of alleged paranormal encounters. While the sensationalism inherent in such lists is undeniable, dismissing the entire collection outright would be a disservice to the genuine anomalies that may be present. Many of these videos likely represent genuine attempts by individuals to document experiences they cannot explain.

However, the significant presence of easily debunked visual artifacts and the statistical likelihood of hoaxes within such a high-volume compilation mean that critical analysis is paramount. It is improbable that all twenty, let alone "plus a few extra," videos represent irrefutable evidence of spectral entities.

My verdict leans towards a mixed assessment:

  • Genuine Anomalies (Likely a Small Percentage): Some clips may capture authentic, unexplained phenomena. These are the cases that warrant further, in-depth investigation. They are the needles in the haystack, requiring careful isolation and rigorous examination.
  • Misinterpretations/Natural Explanations (Significant Portion): A considerable number of videos likely fall into the category of misidentified natural phenomena, psychological effects like pareidolia, or equipment glitches.
  • Intentional Hoaxes (Highly Probable): The ease of digital manipulation and the lure of viral content suggest that a notable percentage of these videos are deliberate fabrications.

The true value of such compilations lies not in their definitive proof, but in their ability to spark curiosity and encourage investigative thinking. They are starting points, prompts for deeper inquiry into the nature of consciousness, perception, and the unexplained. For those seeking concrete evidence, these clips are a gateway; for the discerning investigator, they are merely the initial briefing in an ongoing case.

The Investigator's Archive: Essential Resources

To truly understand the nuances of paranormal investigation and critically assess visual evidence, one must immerse themselves in established research. The following resources have consistently provided valuable insights and methodologies:

  • Books:
  • "The Anomaly" by Jacques Vallée: Explores the broader UFO/paranormal phenomenon with a rigorous, scientific mindset.
  • "The Haunted" by Jeffrey J. Kripal: Offers a scholarly yet open-minded examination of mediumship and paranormal experiences, contextualizing them within religious and cultural frameworks.
  • "Ghost Hunting: Principles and Practices" by Chad L. T. Smith: A practical guide for aspiring investigators, detailing equipment, techniques, and ethical considerations.
  • Documentaries/Series:
  • "Hellier" (2019-2020): A multi-season docuseries that blurs the lines between investigation, personal journey, and the phenomenon itself.
  • "The Phenomenon" (2020): A comprehensive look at the modern UFO era, featuring interviews with high-profile witnesses and researchers.
  • "A Haunting" (Various Seasons): While dramatized, this series often illustrates common types of reported hauntings and paranormal events that fuel community submissions.
  • Platforms:
  • Gaia.com: Offers a vast library of documentaries and series on paranormal topics, spiritual growth, and consciousness, curated by researchers in the field.
  • YouTube Channels: Besides "Nuke's Top 5," channels like "Beyond Creepy," "MrBallen," and "Nexpo" often delve into paranormal lore, though critical evaluation of their content is always advised.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • Q1: How can I tell if a ghost video is real or fake?
A1: There's no single definitive test. Key indicators of a potential hoax include obvious editing artifacts, lack of context, motion blur during static shots, inconsistent lighting, and sounds that seem too clear or too conveniently placed. Always look for independent corroboration, environmental data (EMF, temperature), and consider simpler explanations first.
  • Q2: What is the most common explanation for ghost sightings on video?
A2: The most common explanations are misidentified natural phenomena (orbs, shadows, reflections), psychological effects (pareidolia, suggestion), and intentional hoaxes.
  • Q3: Are there any professional organizations that verify ghost videos?
A3: The field of paranormal investigation is largely unregulated. While various private groups exist that investigate claims, there isn't a single, universally recognized professional body that certifies the authenticity of paranormal videos. Researchers often rely on peer review within their own communities.
  • Q4: What equipment is essential for capturing credible paranormal evidence on video?
A4: Essential equipment includes full-spectrum cameras, infrared cameras, high-sensitivity audio recorders (for EVP), EMF meters, temperature gauges, and potentially motion-activated cameras. The key is not just the equipment, but understanding how to use it and interpret the data contextually.

Your Field Mission: Documenting the Anomalous

The exercise presented by "Nuke's Top 5" is a valuable starting point. Now, it's your turn to act as an investigator.

Your Mission: Next time you encounter a piece of visual media that claims to show paranormal activity, whether it's from a compilation like this or a personal submission:

1. Isolate and Analyze: Download or save the footage if possible. 2. Scrutinize Every Frame: Look for the subtle clues: light anomalies, potential reflections, inconsistent shadows, or digital glitches. Can you identify any dust or insects? 3. Consider the Context: Where was it filmed? Who filmed it? What were the environmental conditions? Is there any accompanying audio? 4. Eliminate the Mundane: Actively seek out the most logical, non-paranormal explanation. If you can't find one, that's when the case becomes interesting. 5. Document Your Findings: Write down your observations. If you find evidence of a hoax, note it. If you genuinely believe it's anomalous, articulate precisely why.

Share your analysis (not necessarily the video itself, unless you have permission) in the comments below. Let's cultivate a community of critical thinkers who can sift through the sensationalism to find the kernels of genuine mystery.

alejandro quintero ruiz is a veteran field investigator dedicated to the analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach combines methodological skepticism with an open mind to the inexplicable, always seeking the truth behind the veil of reality.

The pursuit of truth in the paranormal realm is a demanding, often frustrating endeavor. The compilation of these "Top 20 SCARIEST Ghost Videos" is a testament to the enduring human fascination with the unknown, and a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in separating fact from fiction in the digital age. Approach such content with a healthy dose of skepticism, a keen eye for detail, and an unwavering commitment to rigorous analysis. The real investigation begins when the screen goes dark.

Posted by No comments:
Etiquetas: , , , , , , , , ,

Top 5 Terrifying Ghost Videos: An Analyst's Dossier on Paranormal Footage



Introduction: Decoding the Spectral Data

The digital age has flooded us with an unprecedented volume of alleged paranormal evidence. Social media platforms, particularly YouTube, serve as vast repositories for ghost videos, shadow creature sightings, and accounts of poltergeist activity. But in this deluge of data, how do we separate genuine anomalies from elaborate hoaxes or misinterpretations? This dossier delves into five particularly compelling video accounts, moving beyond simple narration to a rigorous analytical dissection. We aim to understand the nature of these recordings, not as entertainment, but as data points in the ongoing investigation into the unexplained.

Our objective is not to simply present "scary videos" but to apply a critical lens, examining the context, potential explanations, and inherent ambiguities within each clip. The question isn't solely whether a ghost is captured on camera, but *what* is captured, and what methodology can we employ to approach such claims with both open-mindedness and scientific rigor.

Case 1: The Cursed Phone at Whispering Pines

Our first case originates from a TikTok ghost investigation, reportedly set in a derelict school building known as Whispering Pines. The central artifact here is a seemingly ordinary, yet supposedly cursed, mobile phone discovered within its decaying walls. The narrative suggests this phone acts as a conduit or a beacon for supernatural activity. Such artifacts often feature in folklore – objects imbued with residual energy or malevolent intent. From an investigator's perspective, initial analysis must focus on the authenticity of the discovery and the plausibility of the "curse" narrative.

"The phone’s screen flickered to life without being touched, displaying a distorted image that felt… watchful. A chilling invitation from beyond the veil."

The claim of a haunted school provides fertile ground for poltergeist activity, often attributed to the emotional imprints of past occupants. However, the presence of a "cursed" object like a phone introduces a layer of manufactured mystery. Is the device genuinely active, or is it a prop in a staged event? We must consider the technical aspects: the phone's battery life, the possibility of remote activation, and whether the footage itself shows any signs of manipulation. This investigation unit will also cross-reference similar cases involving cursed objects within paranormal circles, seeking common patterns or investigative protocols that were potentially overlooked by the original hunters.

Case 2: The Shadow Figure of Blackwood Manor

Next, we examine footage purportedly showing a shadow creature that has become a recurring presence in a family’s home, identified as Blackwood Manor. Shadow figures are a recurring theme in paranormal literature, often described as non-corporeal entities perceived as darkened, humanoid shapes. Their ephemeral nature makes them exceptionally difficult to document conclusively. Skeptics often attribute these sightings to pareidolia – the psychological phenomenon where the mind perceives familiar patterns (like faces or figures) in random stimuli, such as shadows cast by furniture or natural light phenomena.

The key here is the *regularity* of the appearance. If this entity is perceived consistently by multiple individuals within the household, and if its manifestations occur independently of specific lighting conditions or object placement, it warrants deeper scrutiny. We must analyze the recordings for anomalies beyond simple shadow play: Does the figure move in ways that defy natural physics? Does it interact with the environment? An essential part of our analysis involves reviewing architectural plans of Blackwood Manor (if available), searching for unusual light sources, drafts, or structural elements that could create deceptive shadows. Furthermore, we will explore the psychological state of the residents; prolonged stress or suggestion can sometimes lead to heightened perceptual sensitivity.

Case 3: Canine Clairvoyance or Pareidolia?

This segment presents a dog reacting to what its owner perceives as an apparition – a phenomenon the owner herself cannot see. This introduces a fascinating layer: the potential for non-human witnesses to paranormal events. Animals, particularly dogs, possess sensory capabilities that exceed our own. Their hearing range is wider, and their olfactory senses are far more acute. It’s plausible they can detect subtle environmental changes or energies that elude human perception. However, we must also consider canine behavioral triggers. A dog might react to infrasound, unusual electrical fields, or even minute temperature fluctuations that indicate a draft or an unseen pest. The owner’s interpretation of the dog’s reaction is itself a form of subjective evidence.

Our analysis protocol will focus on correlating the dog's behavior with any discernible environmental anomalies captured on camera. Are there subtle shifts in ambient temperature? Unexplained sounds at frequencies beyond the human hearing range? Or is the dog simply reacting to something mundane that the camera fails to register, like an insect or a distant noise? The presence of a possible apparition, visible only to the animal, poses a significant challenge. It pushes the boundaries of empirical evidence, forcing us to rely heavily on interpreting animal behavior and the owner’s subjective report.

Case 4: Poltergeist Manifestations at Elm Street House

Here we shift to a documented investigation by the Paranormal Nightmare TV Series team. They encountered what they identified as a poltergeist during their work in a notoriously haunted house on Elm Street. Poltergeist activity, derived from the German for "noisy ghost," typically involves physical disturbances: objects moving, doors opening or closing, noises, and even physical assaults. Scientific explanations range from localized electromagnetic field fluctuations (EMFs) to seismic activity, rare geological phenomena, or even psychological distress manifesting as perceived physical events (Mass Psychogenic Illness).

The critical factor in this case is the team's professional investigation. We need to evaluate their methodology. Did they utilize standard equipment like EMF meters, temperature sensors, and audio recorders capable of capturing Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP)? Were their findings objective, or heavily influenced by their preconceptions? A thorough review would involve scrutinizing their equipment readings, analyzing any captured EVPs for linguistic coherence and context, and assessing their claims against known psychological and physical explanations. This segment tests the viewers' understanding of investigative techniques and the importance of objective data over sensationalized accounts. For those interested in replicating such investigations, access to reliable ghost hunting equipment is paramount.

Case 5: The Ghostly Girl of Willow Creek Asylum

The final entry features ghost hunter Ricky Velazquez encountering a child ghost in an abandoned location, identified as Willow Creek Asylum. Abandoned institutions like asylums are archetypal settings for paranormal investigation, often steeped in tragic histories that, according to some theories, can lead to lingering emotional imprints or intelligent hauntings. The recurring motif of a child ghost adds a layer of poignant tragedy. However, it also presents specific challenges for analysis.

Apparitions of children are sometimes attributed to residual energy – an energetic replay of past events. Alternatively, they could be interpreted as intelligent hauntings, where the entity is aware of its surroundings and the investigators. Skeptical analysis must consider the possibility of misidentified objects, reflections, or even deliberate staging. The location itself, Willow Creek Asylum, likely has its own documented history of alleged hauntings, which could influence observer perception. We will analyze the footage for any interaction between Velazquez and the alleged entity. Are there EVPs? Is the entity responsive to communication attempts? The history of the asylum, often available via local archives or books on regional hauntings, would be crucial context for understanding the reported phenomena. For serious investigators, understanding the history of such locations is as vital as the equipment they carry.

Investigator's Verdict: Sifting Fact from Fiction

Reviewing these five cases, a consistent theme emerges: the subjective interpretation of ambiguous data. While the footage presented is often unsettling and visually suggestive, definitive proof of paranormal activity remains elusive. The "cursed phone" case relies heavily on narrative and the perceived intention behind an object. The shadow creature sighting, while visually striking, could easily be attributed to natural shadow play or pareidolia, especially in a dimly lit environment. The dog's reaction, though intriguing, is hard to verify as genuinely supernatural, given animals' heightened senses. The poltergeist investigation, while conducted by a team, still hinges on the interpretation of their readings and captured audio. Finally, the asylum footage of a child ghost is a classic trope, prone to misidentification and narrative embellishment.

However, to dismiss these instances outright would be to ignore the persistent human experience of the unexplained. The recurring patterns across these cases – the shadows, the disembodied voices, the interactive phenomena – suggest that *something* is occurring. Whether it is a genuinely supernatural manifestation or a complex interplay of psychological factors, environmental stimuli, and potential deception, remains the central question. The most probable conclusion, based on rigorous analysis, leans towards a combination: environmental and psychological factors often mimic paranormal activity, but the sheer volume and consistency of such reports across cultures and time suggest that some phenomena may indeed defy conventional explanation, at least with our current scientific understanding. The challenge for us, the investigators, is to remain critical while acknowledging the vast unknowns.

The Investigator's Archive

For those seeking to delve deeper into the critical analysis of paranormal phenomena, consulting foundational texts and resources is essential. These provide frameworks for understanding, investigating, and debunking claims, fostering a more informed perspective:

  • On Ghosts and Spirits: Books like "The Ghost Hunter's Survival Guide" by Hans Holzer or "The Complete Book of Ghosts" by Pamela Ball offer comprehensive overviews of phenomena and investigation techniques.
  • Investigative Methodologies: Understanding the principles behind such as J. Allen Hynek’s UFO classification system can be applied to paranormal evidence. Examining works by researchers like Charles Fort, who meticulously cataloged anomalies, is also vital.
  • Psychological Aspects: Resources on pareidolia, cryptomnesia, and mass psychogenic illness are crucial for debunking. Works by psychologists specializing in perception and belief are invaluable.
  • Documentaries: Critical documentaries that explore the science behind alleged hauntings, rather than solely sensationalizing them, provide excellent case studies. Investigating documentaries like "The Phenomenon" (for UFOs, but applicable principles) or critical examinations of famous hauntings offer insights.
  • Archival Resources: Websites like the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) or academic journals that touch on parapsychology (while maintaining critical distance) can offer raw data for analysis.

Access to these resources, alongside a commitment to critical thinking, forms the bedrock of any serious paranormal investigation.

Protocol: Analyzing Paranormal Footage

When confronted with alleged paranormal video evidence, a systematic approach is paramount. This protocol outlines the essential steps:

  1. Source Verification: Ascertain the origin of the footage. Is it a direct capture, or has it been edited, shared multiple times, or taken out of context? Check social media history and original upload dates.
  2. Environmental Analysis: Examine the background for clues. Are there natural light sources that could create shadows? Are there reflections in windows or surfaces? Any visible equipment that could be used for staging?
  3. Object/Entity Movement Analysis: If an object or entity appears to move, does its motion follow plausible physics? Or does it exhibit unnatural acceleration, deceleration, or trajectory changes?
  4. Audio Examination: Is there accompanying audio? Analyze it for EVPs (Electronic Voice Phenomena). Listen for background noises that might explain visual anomalies.
  5. Witness Testimony Deconstruction: If available, analyze witness statements. Are they consistent? Do they align with the visual evidence? Are there signs of suggestion or undue influence?
  6. Technical Anomalies: Look for glitches in the video or audio recording itself that might indicate digital manipulation.
  7. Cross-Referencing: Compare the footage with known hoaxes, debunked cases, and documented phenomena. Look for similarities in tactics or visual artifacts.
  8. Occam's Razor Application: Always favor the simplest explanation that fits the facts. Is there a mundane explanation that accounts for all observed phenomena?

This structured analysis, while not always yielding definitive answers, helps to move beyond mere sensationalism towards a more evidence-based understanding.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Can ghost videos be definitively proven real?

A1: Currently, no ghost video has been definitively proven as supernatural by the scientific community. While some footage is highly suggestive, it often remains open to interpretation and alternative, mundane explanations.

Q2: What are the most common hoaxes in ghost videos?

A2: Common hoaxes include intentional staging with actors, digital manipulation (editing), exploiting pareidolia (seeing patterns in random data), and misinterpreting natural phenomena like shadows, reflections, or infrasound.

Q3: How can I critically assess a ghost video I see online?

A3: Critically assess by looking for inconsistencies, checking the source, considering environmental factors, evaluating witness testimony, and searching for potential mundane explanations before concluding it is supernatural.

Q4: What is pareidolia and how does it relate to ghost sightings?

A4: Pareidolia is the tendency to perceive meaningful images or patterns (like faces or figures) in random visual or auditory stimuli. It’s a primary explanation for many alleged ghost sightings, where vague shapes or shadows are interpreted as entities.

Conclusion: The Unseen Edge

The collection of videos presented offers a tantalizing glimpse into the persistent human fascination with the spectral realm. While the presented evidence, through rigorous analysis, largely resides in the ambiguous territory between definitive proof and outright fabrication, it serves a crucial purpose. These recordings, and others like them, compel us to question the boundaries of our perceived reality. They highlight the psychological phenomena that drive our interpretations and the technical challenges inherent in capturing and verifying anomalies.

Ultimately, the pursuit of truth in paranormal investigation requires a disciplined approach. We must embrace the evidence, dissect it critically, and remain aware of our own biases. The truly terrifying aspect might not be the ghosts themselves, but our own fallibility in discerning reality from illusion. The digital age has amplified these questions, making critical analysis more vital than ever. The work continues.

Your Mission: Deconstruct the Phenomena

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to become a digital detective. Take one of the video types described – a shadow creature, a poltergeist event, or an anomalous audio recording – and find an example online (YouTube, TikTok, etc.). Apply the "Protocol: Analyzing Paranormal Footage" outlined above. Document your findings in the comments below. Specifically, focus on:

  • What mundane explanations could account for the phenomena?
  • Are there any indicators of digital manipulation or staging?
  • What elements, if any, remain truly anomalous after your analysis?

Share your critical assessment. Let's see if we can collectively peel back another layer of the unknown, or at least understand why we are so drawn to believing.

alejandro quintero ruiz is a veteran field investigator dedicated to the analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach combines methodological skepticism with an open mind to the inexplicable, always seeking the truth behind the veil of reality.

Posted by No comments:
Etiquetas: , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)