Showing posts with label viral horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label viral horror. Show all posts

30 Scary Videos That'll Make You Question Reality: An Investigator's Analysis





Note from the Investigator: The following analysis delves into a compilation of potentially anomalous video evidence. Viewers are advised that some content may be disturbing.

Introduction: The Unsettling Tapestry of 2022

The calendar flips, a mere abstract concept measuring the relentless march of time, yet 2022 has felt like an eternity compressed into a fleeting moment. This temporal dissonance isn't unique to our current epoch; it's a symptom of living through periods where the veil between the ordinary and the extraordinary seems to fray at an accelerated rate. As we stand precisely at the midpoint of this year, the horror genre has delivered an unprecedented bounty of unsettling, terrifying, and reality-bending events captured on digital media. This compilation isn't merely a collection of scary videos; it's a curated dossier of incidents that challenge our fundamental understanding of reality itself. The entries within this list are designed to erode your certainty, blurring the lines between the tangible world and the deepest recesses of our worst nightmares. Be warned: the psychological impact of these clips can linger, disrupting sleep and fostering a persistent unease. As a seasoned investigator of the paranormal, I've analyzed countless recordings of purported ghost encounters, haunted locations, and inexplicable phenomena. The sheer potency of some of these video fragments transcends mere storytelling; they demand a visceral experience to grasp their profound disquiet. While the concept of "ghost encounters" often conjures images of sensationalized tales or antiquated photographic trickery, this collection aims to present something far more immediate and, frankly, more disturbing: potential evidence of the genuinely anomalous. Prepare to question your perception of reality. These videos offer a journey into the uncanny, delivering the dread that permeates many haunted locales without the need for you to brave those dangerous environments yourself.

The descent into this unnerving compendium is not for the faint of heart. The sheer intensity of the fear these clips can evoke may prove overwhelming for some. However, for those who possess the fortitude to confront the ambiguous and the terrifying, this list serves as a gauntlet.

Having navigated this unsettling compilation, the critical question remains: which of these spectral visions left the most indelible mark on your psyche? Your insights are crucial. Share your veredict below in the comments.

Sources Referenced

  • 30. https://youtu.be/cT1Rp2JTi3o
  • 29. https://youtu.be/kXqlBOSoGsw
  • 28. https://youtu.be/FzrXqmgNAEo
  • 27. pasischmid/Reddit
  • 26. WizzerKrizzer/Reddit
  • 25. Do Not Like or Follow/FB
  • 24. .mrscarystories/TikTok
  • 23. spookyscarylatenights/TikTok
  • 22. https://youtu.be/QpDJZc4FRls
  • 21. https://youtu.be/BrYiZqvYJvk
  • 20. Chloe Szepanowski
  • 19. https://youtu.be/1JqUzBNtwDk
  • 18. https://youtu.be/38JjhHcprRs
  • 17. https://youtu.be/693jC93jp9M
  • 16. https://youtu.be/TXhjNsuriqs
  • 15. https://youtu.be/0p35yYr97a8
  • 14. https://youtu.be/FR1uSKMA97A
  • 13. elcucuy.tv/TikTok
  • 12. https://youtu.be/2q-bLEdNzwzO4
  • 11. https://youtu.be/5AcGBg-7eYU
  • 10. https://youtu.be/Fk3fB4acvSo
  • 9. https://youtu.be/vrIIxEkdcd8
  • 8. https://youtu.be/3EuXMclb3zE
  • 7. https://youtu.be/ApD-DoN9LUw
  • 6. https://youtu.be/rtUDgqyW41Q
  • 5. https://youtu.be/ClZHg4tbMpw
  • 4. https://youtu.be/3acDhSZqA0A
  • 3. https://youtu.be/VkUxE9xID_I
  • 2. https://youtu.be/drcgveM5MC0
  • 1. phebed_/TikTok

Music Credits: Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), jdgehlert (pond5.com)

Entry Timestamps: 0:00 Intro | 0:20 Number 30 | 1:36 Number 29 | 2:16 Number 28 | 3:45 Number 27 | 4:53 Number 26 | 6:26 Number 25 | 7:42 Number 24 | 8:37 Number 23 | 9:31 Number 22 | 10:33 Number 21 | 12:23 Number 20 | 14:02 Number 19 | 16:11 Number 18 | 18:29 Number 17 | 20:48 Number 16 | 23:09 Number 15 | 24:35 Number 14 | 25:25 Number 13 | 26:23 Number 12 | 28:13 Number 11 | 29:56 Number 10 | 32:30 Number 9 | 34:12 Number 8 | 36:20 Number 7 | 38:37 Number 6 | 39:46 Number 5 | 41:18 Number 4 | 42:04 Number 3 | 42:56 Number 2 | 44:20 Number 1

Analyzing the Anomalous: A Methodical Approach to Viral Footage

The digital age has democratized the documentation of the strange. Viral videos, once dismissed as mere internet curiosities, now form a significant corpus of purported paranormal evidence. However, their very virality often outpaces critical analysis. My role as an investigator is to intercede, to apply a rigorous framework to these fleeting glimpses of the inexplicable. This compilation, while undeniably effective in evoking primal fear, necessitates a deeper dissection. We must move beyond visceral reaction to analytical assessment. The ease with which digital media can be manipulated – deepfakes, staged events for clicks, pareidolia amplified by suggestion – means that every frame must be scrutinized. Are we witnessing genuine spectral activity, residual energy imprints, or simply the misinterpretation of mundane occurrences?

The sheer volume of "scary videos" available online presents a unique challenge. It's akin to sifting through a mountain of forensic evidence, where the vast majority is irrelevant, yet hidden within lies the potential breakthrough. A key aspect of analyzing such content involves understanding common visual and auditory anomalies. This includes identifying potential Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) – disembodied voices captured on recordings – or unusual EMF (Electromagnetic Field) fluctuations that some theorize accompany paranormal activity. Yet, even these phenomena have mundane explanations. A draft, a faulty appliance, or even radio interference can mimic paranormal signatures.

To truly engage with this material, one must cultivate a healthy skepticism, not as a tool of denial, but as a refined instrument for weeding out the plausible. This process is essential for identifying those rare instances that resist conventional explanation.

Evidential Integrity: Separating Signal from Noise

The core of any paranormal investigation lies in the integrity of the evidence. A video clip, no matter how disturbing, holds little value if its provenance is questionable or its authenticity can be easily debunked. This list presents a chronological progression of scares, but the critical question for any investigator is not *if* it's scary, but *if* it's real.

"The difference between a ghost story and a ghost is the credibility of the witness and the consistency of the phenomenon."

The sources cited range from personal social media accounts on TikTok and Reddit to links on YouTube and mentions of reputable publications like the Smithsonian Magazine and Daily Mail. While some of these platforms host genuine eyewitness accounts, they are also fertile ground for hoaxes. The challenge lies in cross-referencing information, seeking corroborating evidence, and understanding the inherent biases of user-generated content.

For instance, a clip attributed to a "haunted house tour" gains immediate weight if documented by multiple independent sources or if it aligns with known historical accounts of the location. Conversely, a TikTok video with no verifiable context or origin story warrants extreme caution. My experience suggests that many viral paranormal videos initially gain traction due to their shock value, with rigorous verification often lagging far behind. The presence of timestamps indicating the duration of each segment further suggests an effort at organization, perhaps for a documentary or a curated presentation. However, these timestamps themselves do not guarantee authenticity. They merely indicate the structure of the presentation.

When evaluating potential paranormal footage, I employ a multi-faceted approach:

  • Source Verification: Investigating the origin of the video. Is it from a known paranormal investigator, a reputable news outlet, or an anonymous social media account?
  • Contextual Analysis: Examining the historical background of any location or event depicted. Does the footage align with established lore or documented occurrences?
  • Technical Examination: Looking for signs of digital manipulation, such as unnatural movements, inconsistent lighting, or audio artifacts that suggest editing. Tools like reverse image searches and metadata analysis can be invaluable here.
  • Witness Corroboration: If multiple witnesses are involved, do their accounts align? Are there independent reports of the same phenomenon?
The pursuit of truth in the paranormal realm demands patience and a methodical approach. Rushing to judgment based on the emotional impact of a video is a critical error that undermines the very goal of investigation.

The Psychology of Fear: Why These Videos Resonate

The effectiveness of these clips in eliciting a fear response is undeniable. This isn't merely about jump scares; it's about tapping into deeper psychological vulnerabilities. The mid-2022 release date is significant, placing these videos within a cultural landscape already saturated with uncertainty and anxiety.

"Fear is a primal response, but understanding its source is the first step to overcoming it, or at least, to studying it objectively."

The compilation likely leverages several psychological triggers:

  • The Uncanny Valley: Videos featuring entities that are almost, but not quite, human can evoke profound discomfort.
  • Ambiguity and the Unknown: When events are not fully explained, our minds tend to fill in the gaps with our worst fears. The lack of definitive answers in many of these clips is precisely what makes them so potent.
  • Implication of Vulnerability: Footage showing seemingly ordinary environments (homes, public spaces) invaded by the inexplicable suggests that no place is truly safe.
  • The Power of Suggestion: The very act of presenting these as "scary videos" primes the viewer to interpret subsequent events through a lens of fear.
This is why understanding the psychological underpinnings of fear is as crucial as analyzing the technical aspects of the footage. It helps explain *why* these videos affect us so deeply, regardless of their ultimate veracity. For those seeking to explore these concepts further, works by psychologists like Paul Ekman on facial expressions of emotion, or texts discussing evolutionary psychology and fear responses, provide valuable context.

The intention behind compiling such a list is often to provoke a reaction, to test the viewer's courage, and perhaps, to sell a narrative of the genuinely terrifying. As an investigator, I view this as an opportunity to dissect the mechanisms of fear itself. It’s not enough to be scared; we must understand *why* we are scared. This analytical distance is vital.

The Archive of the Investigator: Essential Tools and Resources

To navigate the complex landscape of paranormal investigation, especially when dealing with video evidence, a robust toolkit and knowledge base are indispensable. While this list itself serves as a curated collection of potential evidence, true investigation requires more. Investing in the right equipment and knowledge can transform a passive viewer into an active investigator.

For those serious about analyzing such phenomena, consider the following:

  • High-Sensitivity Digital Recorders: Essential for capturing potential EVPs. While smartphones have recorders, dedicated devices often offer superior clarity and sensitivity.
  • EMF Meters: Devices like the K-II EMF meter are standard in paranormal investigations, used to detect electromagnetic field fluctuations that some believe correlate with paranormal activity.
  • Full-Spectrum Cameras: These cameras can capture light beyond the visible spectrum, including infrared and ultraviolet, potentially revealing phenomena not visible to the naked eye.
  • Audio/Video Analysis Software: Tools for scrutinizing footage for manipulation and analyzing audio for anomalies.
  • Reference Books: Works by pioneers like J. Allen Hynek (for UFO analysis), Charles Fort (for cataloging anomalies), and contemporary researchers like Nick Redfern or Micah Hanks offer invaluable frameworks and case studies.
Platforms like Gaia and Discovery+ often host documentaries that delve into these topics, though critical evaluation of their content is always advised. Understanding these tools and expanding your knowledge base is the next logical step after experiencing a compilation like this. It’s about moving from passive reception to active inquiry.

### Protocol: Analyzing Video Evidence

1. Document Acquisition: Obtain the original, unedited video file if possible. Be wary of downloaded or re-uploaded versions, which may have already undergone alteration. 2. Timestamp Review: Analyze each segment at the indicated timestamps. Pay close attention to the initial few seconds of each clip, as anomalies are often subtle. 3. Visual Scan: Look for anomalies in lighting, shadows, reflections, and object movement. Note any figures or presences that seem out of place or behave unnaturally. 4. Audio Analysis: Listen intently for disembodied voices (EVP), unexplained sounds, or distortions in ambient noise. Use headphones for maximum clarity. 5. Contextual Research: If a location is mentioned or implied, research its history. Are there documented paranormal claims associated with it? 6. Cross-Referencing: Search for other videos or reports of similar phenomena from the same location or involving similar circumstances. 7. Expert Consultation: If significant anomalous activity is suspected, consider consulting with experienced paranormal investigators or forensic video analysts.

Investigator's Verdict: Reality's Fragile Veil

This compilation is a potent reminder of how easily our perception of reality can be challenged. The sheer diversity of phenomena presented—from apparent apparitions and poltergeist activity to unexplained lights and fleeting figures—spans the breadth of what is commonly categorized as paranormal.

The primary strength of this collection lies in its sheer impact. It effectively bombards the viewer with a barrage of unsettling imagery, making it difficult to maintain a critical distance. The inclusion of direct links and timestamps, while imperfect from an evidentiary standpoint, provides a starting point for further investigation.

However, the significant weakness remains the inherent ambiguity and lack of verifiable context for many of the clips. The prevalence of user-generated content from platforms like TikTok and Reddit, while potentially containing genuine sightings, also represents a significant source of staged events and misinterpretations. The absence of detailed forensic analysis within the compilation itself leaves the viewer to perform that crucial step.

Are these videos definitive proof of the paranormal? No. But do they represent a compelling body of anecdotal evidence that warrants further scrutiny and investigation? Absolutely. The true value of this list is not as a definitive catalog of proof, but as a catalyst for critical thinking and further inquiry. It highlights the need for rigorous investigative methodologies, even when faced with the emotionally compelling nature of these recordings. The veil of reality may be fragile, but it is our duty to scrutinize every tear and fray.

Your Field Mission: Deconstructing the Distorted

Now, the true work begins. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to take one of the phenomena presented in this list—or a similar one you've encountered online—and apply a critical lens.

1. Select a Clip: Choose one of the videos or a similar piece of anomalous footage. 2. Research its Origin: Try to trace back its source. Can you find the original uploader? Is there any verifiable context provided? 3. Analyze for Mundane Explanations: List at least three plausible, non-paranormal explanations for what is depicted. Consider lighting, shadows, reflections, sound interference, pareidolia, or potential digital manipulation. 4. Identify Remaining Anomalies: What, if anything, remains unexplainable after your analysis? 5. Formulate a Hypothesis: Based on your findings, propose a hypothesis about the nature of the phenomenon. Is it most likely a hoax, a misinterpretation, or a genuine anomaly?

Document your findings. Share your analysis, even if it debunks the clip, in the comments below. The collective knowledge of our investigative community is our most powerful tool.

---

About the Author:

alejandro quintero ruiz is a veteran field investigator dedicated to the analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach combines methodological skepticism with an open mind to the inexplicable, always seeking the truth behind the veil of reality.

---

The Abyss of the Unseen: Analyzing 30 Terrifying Videos That Crossed the Line




Late night, lights off. The primal instinct for self-preservation kicks into overdrive, and fear, that most subjective of human emotions, begins its insidious work. For some, it's the chill of social anxiety; for others, the suffocating dread of the unknown—a deep-seated apprehension of what lurks beyond the veil of comprehension. Today, we don't just present a list; we open an investigation into the disturbing digital tapestry woven from 30 "scary videos gone horribly wrong."

The Digital Unconscious: Fear in the Age of Viral Content

These aren't the choreographed scares of Hollywood. This compilation delves into the raw, unfiltered substrata of the internet, a place where genuine events, supernatural whispers, and nerve-wracking suspense coalesce. The reality, as it often does, proves far stranger and more unsettling than any fictional narrative. Within these digital fragments, we may catch glimpses of phenomena that chill us to the bone, forcing an encounter with fear on multiple, visceral levels. It's a grim prospect, yet one that defines the very essence of our exploration here. While many might turn to scary flicks, horror TV shows, or ghost stories for a good fright, there's an arguable pinnacle of the scary experience: the viral video. It offers an unparalleled immersion, allowing us to consume uncanny ambiances as they unfold, becoming participants in—or witnesses to—events that defy easy explanation.

The entries analyzed herein are hand-picked from the darkest, most secluded corners of the web. They are designed to inflict discomfort from the very first frame, delivering an unrivalled sense of doom and atmospheric dread that simmers in the gut with every passing second. These aren't mere distractions; they are confrontations with our deepest, most primal fears, designed to rip at the very strands of perceived sanity. The overwhelming dread these videos propagate seems to emanate from every pixel, raising the stakes of our subjective reality.

Anatomy of a Scare: Real Events vs. Supernatural Specters

The allure of the paranormal, especially when presented through the visual medium of video, lies in its potential to shatter our mundane existence. But how do we scientifically approach phenomena that, by their very nature, resist empirical validation? This compilation presents a spectrum of alleged anomalies: from genuinely disturbing real-world occurrences that defy rational explanation to outright supernatural scares and meticulously crafted suspense. The critical task before us is to dissect these videos not as mere entertainment, but as potential data points—anomalies in the fabric of observable reality. We must ask: Is this a rare glimpse into the otherworldly, a product of mass hysteria amplified by digital platforms, or a sophisticated hoax designed to exploit our innate fear of the unknown? The distinction is crucial.

It’s imperative to understand that the human mind is a powerful pattern-recognition machine. Pareidolia, the tendency to perceive familiar patterns (like faces or figures) in random stimuli, can easily lead us astray. Furthermore, the very act of seeking out frightening content conditions our perception, making us more susceptible to interpreting ambiguous visuals as overtly menacing. This psychological predisposition is precisely what makes analysing these videos a complex, yet vital, exercise in critical thinking. We are not here to merely be scared; we are here to investigate the mechanisms of fear and the nature of the alleged phenomena themselves.

Video Evidence Paradigms: From Found Footage to Digital Specters

The "found footage" genre, popularized by films like *The Blair Witch Project*, has blurred the lines between fiction and reality. Online, this concept takes on a more potent, often disturbing, form. Videos passed off as genuine, whether they depict alleged paranormal activity, cryptid sightings, or inexplicable events, invite scrutiny. We must employ a rigorous methodology, akin to forensic analysis, dissecting each frame for anomalies, inconsistencies, and potential manipulation. This involves examining visual artifacts, audio signatures, and contextual clues that might point towards fabrication or, conversely, genuine strangeness.

Consider the subtle distortions sometimes present in alleged spirit photography or the unidentifiable sounds captured in EVP (Electronic Voice Phenomena) recordings. These are the breadcrumbs left behind by the inexplicable. While skeptics will readily posit mundane explanations—dust particles as orbs, background noise as disembodied voices—a true investigator acknowledges the possibility, however remote, that these are genuine traces of phenomena beyond our current scientific understanding. The challenge lies in differentiating statistical outliers from undeniable evidence. For instance, a single instance of an unexplained audio anomaly might be dismissed, but a consistent pattern across multiple recordings, coupled with corroborating visual evidence, warrants deeper investigation.

"The line between the rational and the irrational is not a solid wall, but a permeable membrane. Our job is to test its integrity, not to assume it's impenetrable." - Alejandro Quintero Ruiz

Case Studies: Blurring the Lines

The videos presented are a stark reminder that the digital realm is a repository not only of information but of raw human experience—sometimes terrifyingly so. We are not dealing with simple jump scares here. We are confronting phenomena that seem to originate from a place where the rules of our universe fray at the edges. Some entries may present classic alleged hauntings or spectral apparitions, while others delve into more obscure territory, such as territorial territorial territorial territorial territorial spirits or even unexplained biological anomalies that defy classification. The sheer variety underscores the multifaceted nature of anomalous phenomena.

For example, a video allegedly capturing a poltergeist might show objects moving autonomously. The initial analysis would focus on identifying any hidden wires, air currents, or seismic activity. However, if these explanations are exhausted, and the activity persists with a seemingly intelligent, localized pattern, the investigation must pivot towards parapsychological hypotheses. Similarly, videos purportedly showing cryptids require meticulous examination of the creature's morphology, gait, and interaction with its environment, always cross-referencing with known fauna and assessing the possibility of misidentification or outright fabrication. The goal is not to blindly accept but to methodically eliminate the mundane before entertaining the extraordinary.

This compilation serves as a powerful, albeit unsettling, primer. It forces us to confront the possibility that what we believe to be reality is merely a fraction of a larger, more complex, and often terrifying existence. The digital world, with its boundless capacity for recording and dissemination, has become our primary interface with the truly inexplicable. It is a frontier where evidence, however dubious, can achieve viral status, prompting widespread debate and, for some, genuine fear.

Investigator's Verdict: The Psychology of Viral Horror

From a purely analytical standpoint, the concept of a "scary video gone horribly wrong" is deeply intertwined with human psychology. The primal fear of the unknown, the dread of malevolent entities, and the unsettling nature of unexplainable events are potent triggers. When these are amplified by the immediacy of digital media, the effect is exponentially magnified. However, as an investigator, my primary directive is to remain detached, to question every frame, and to challenge every claim. While these videos tap into our deepest fears, the crucial question remains: are they genuine windows into the paranormal, or sophisticated constructions designed to exploit these fears?

My analysis of these types of compilations consistently reveals a blend of genuine anomalies, misinterpretations, and outright hoaxes. The challenge lies in discerning the needle in the haystack. True paranormal phenomena, if they exist, are often subtle and difficult to capture. The videos that "gone horribly wrong" as per the title often involve a significant deviation from what is visually or audibly expected, leading to a heightened sense of unease. Yet, this deviation itself can be the result of human intervention—either through deliberate deception or accidental misinterpretation under duress. Therefore, while these videos may provide a chilling experience, their value as empirical evidence requires the utmost scrutiny. The psychological impact is undeniable, but the existence of genuine paranormal forces remains an ongoing investigation.

The Researcher's Archive

For those seeking to delve deeper into the methodology of analyzing anomalous video evidence and understanding the psychological underpinnings of fear, I highly recommend the following resources. These are not mere entertainment; they are essential tools for any serious investigator looking to distinguish verifiable anomalies from mere digital phantoms:

  • "The Field Guide to UFO Sightings and Encounters" by Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.: While focused on UFOs, Salla's work details critical approaches to analyzing visual evidence and witness testimony.
  • "Real-Life X-Files: Exploring the Paranormal Cause of UFOs, Ghosts, and Other Mysteries" by Jesse Marcel Jr. and Linda Marcel: Offers insights into investigating anomalous phenomena from a witness perspective.
  • "The Encyclopedia of Paranormal Phenomena" by Daniel Cohen: A comprehensive overview of various paranormal claims, providing context for the types of phenomena often depicted in unsettling videos.
  • "Demons & Deliverance" by John Zaffis: For those videos that lean towards demonic or intensely malevolent presences, Zaffis' work delves into the complex and often dangerous nature of such alleged entities.
  • Documentaries like "The Phenomenon" (2020): These films often feature declassified documents and interviews with credible witnesses and researchers, providing a baseline for understanding how official investigations approach anomalous aerial phenomena, which can sometimes overlap with alleged video evidence.

Furthermore, exploring the works of researchers like Jacques Vallée and John Keel is crucial for understanding the historical context and the complex, often multi-faceted, nature of the unknown. Their writings provide frameworks for interpreting anomalous data beyond simple "ghost" or "alien" categorizations.

Your Field Mission: Deconstructing Digital Dread

The internet is a vast, often treacherous, ocean of information and misinformation. Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to become a discerning navigator.

  1. Select One Video: Choose one of the video sources from the provided list (acknowledging that direct links may not be functional or are placeholders for the original content's structure).
  2. Critical Analysis: Watch the video with a detached, analytical mindset. Ask yourself:
    • What are the purported phenomena?
    • What are the potential mundane explanations (e.g., lighting, pareidolia, environmental noise, editing tricks)?
    • Are there inconsistencies in the video or audio?
    • Does the context provided (if any) seem plausible or fabricated?
    • What is the emotional response it elicits, and why? Is it genuine fear or a reaction to manipulative techniques?
  3. Document Your Findings: Write down your observations, theories, and conclusions. Are you leaning towards a paranormal explanation, a hoax, or a misinterpretation?
  4. Share Your Insights (Optional): In the comments below, share the video you analyzed and your brief assessment. Let's foster a community of critical investigators, not passive consumers of fear.

Remember, the greatest mystery often lies not in the event itself, but in our perception and interpretation of it. Become an active participant in understanding the inexplicable.

alejandro quintero ruiz is a seasoned field investigator with years dedicated to the meticulous analysis of anomalous phenomena. His approach is a synthesis of methodological skepticism and an unwavering openness to the unexplained, relentlessly pursuing truth behind the veil of perceived reality. He believes that every unexplained event is a puzzle waiting to be solved, and every piece of evidence, a clue in the grand cosmic investigation.

Ultimately, these 30 videos serve as more than just a collection of scares. They are case files, digital specters from the collective unconscious, begging for our attention and our critical deconstruction. Whether they represent genuine breaches in our understanding of reality or elaborate fabrications, their power to provoke fear and wonder is undeniable. The true investigation begins when we move beyond the initial shock and start asking the difficult questions. What are we truly seeing? And more importantly, what does it reveal about us?